The Chevrolet Equinox stands as a cornerstone in the compact SUV market, with both electric and internal combustion engine options now available to drivers. The introduction of the all-electric Equinox EV alongside the traditional ICE model presents an exciting opportunity to examine how these two powertrains compare in real-world applications. Let’s take a closer look at what makes each version unique and how they stack up against one another for everyday use.

Power and Performance Comparison

Under the hood, the Equinox ICE and EV models deliver distinctly different driving experiences. The traditional Equinox ICE comes equipped with a 1.5-litre turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 175 horsepower and 203 lb-ft of torque. This powertrain offers familiar performance characteristics with immediate acceleration response and consistent power delivery across various driving conditions.

In contrast, the Equinox EV features an electric powertrain that delivers up to 290 horsepower and 346 lb-ft of torque in its performance configuration. The electric drivetrain delivers instant torque from a standstill, resulting in more responsive acceleration than its ICE counterpart. The base Equinox EV model still offers 210 horsepower, outperforming the standard ICE version while maintaining efficiency.

Whether navigating urban streets or exploring scenic routes, the EV’s powerful electric motors ensure you make a statement with smooth, quiet acceleration. The ICE model maintains its own appeal with the familiar sound and feel of a traditional engine, along with the security of established refuelling infrastructure for long-distance travel.

Range and Efficiency Factors

The Equinox ICE achieves approximately 8.9 L/100 km in combined city/highway driving, with a fuel tank capacity that provides roughly 670 km of range on a full tank. This traditional setup allows for quick refueling at widely available gas stations, typically taking less than five minutes to completely refill the tank.

The Equinox EV offers approximately 400 km of range on a single charge with the standard battery pack, while the extended-range battery pushes this to nearly 500 km. Charging the EV takes considerably longer than refueling an ICE vehicle, with a DC fast-charger adding up to 115 km of range in about 10 minutes, or a full charge in approximately 30 minutes under optimal conditions.

For daily commuters, the EV model provides sufficient range for typical weekly driving needs with the convenience of home charging overnight. The ICE version offers the advantage of quick refueling for long-distance trips and complete freedom from charging infrastructure concerns.

Interior Space and Comfort Elements

Despite their different powertrains, both Equinox versions maintain similar interior dimensions. The ICE model features a slightly higher floor in the rear seating area due to the exhaust system, while the EV offers a completely flat floor throughout, creating a more spacious feeling in the cabin and improved rear passenger comfort.

The Equinox EV battery placement in the vehicle floor contributes to a lower centre of gravity, enhancing stability while maintaining generous headroom. This design choice allows for excellent interior space utilization despite accommodating battery components.

Step inside either version and find a spacious, well-appointed cabin. Both models offer generous legroom and headroom, seating five passengers. The interior of the EV features more sustainable materials and a futuristic design language compared to the more traditional aesthetic of the ICE model.

Technology and Driver Assistance Features

The upgraded SYNC® infotainment system in both models provides seamless integration, though the EV version offers a larger 17.7-inch touchscreen compared to the ICE’s 11.3-inch display. Both systems support wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, but the EV adds more advanced features, including sophisticated energy management tools and charging station location services.

Navigation with real-time traffic updates and enhanced voice recognition makes getting to your destination easier and stress-free in both models. The EV version includes additional features specifically designed to maximize range and locate charging infrastructure.

The Equinox EV offers more advanced driver-assistance features as standard, including hands-free highway driving on compatible roads. Both versions include comprehensive safety packages with automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assistance, and blind-spot monitoring, though the EV typically offers more features as standard.

Maintenance Requirements and Ownership Experience

One of the most significant differences between these models lies in their maintenance needs. The Equinox ICE requires regular oil changes every 8,000 to 10,000 km, along with periodic maintenance for systems like the transmission, cooling system, spark plugs, and exhaust components.

The Equinox EV eliminates many traditional maintenance items. With no oil to change, no transmission fluid to replace, and significantly fewer moving parts, maintenance primarily consists of tire rotations, cabin air filter replacements, and coolant system checks at much longer intervals. The regenerative braking system also reduces wear on brake components, extending their service life considerably.

For those seeking lower routine maintenance costs and reduced time spent at service centers, the EV presents clear advantages. The ICE model benefits from an established service network and technicians with extensive experience on traditional vehicles.

Winter Performance and Climate Adaptations

Winter driving presents unique challenges for both powertrains. The Equinox ICE maintains relatively consistent range regardless of temperature, though fuel efficiency decreases somewhat in extreme cold. The heating system draws waste heat from the engine, providing cabin warmth without significantly impacting range.

The Equinox EV experiences more noticeable range reduction in cold weather, potentially decreasing by 20-30% in extreme conditions. Electric heating draws power directly from the battery, further impacting range. However, the EV compensates with features like remote preconditioning while plugged in, allowing you to warm the cabin and battery before unplugging, preserving range once underway.

All-wheel drive is available on both models, providing reliable performance and confidence in a range of road conditions. The EV’s dual-motor AWD system offers more precise torque distribution and immediate response compared to the mechanical AWD system in the ICE version.

Environmental Impact Assessment

The environmental differences between these models extend beyond tailpipe emissions. The Equinox ICE produces approximately 170 g/km of CO2 during operation, while the EV produces zero tailpipe emissions.

The EV’s overall environmental impact depends heavily on the method of electricity generation used for charging. In regions with cleaner electrical grids, the environmental benefits increase substantially. The EV also eliminates other pollution sources, including oil disposal, fuel spills, and various fluid leaks associated with ICE vehicles.

Manufacturing impacts differ as well, with the EV battery production creating a larger initial carbon footprint. However, this difference is typically offset after approximately 20,000 to 40,000 km of driving through reduced operational emissions.

Chevrolet Equinox EV: A Modern Approach to Transportation

The Chevrolet Equinox offers two distinct approaches to modern transportation, each with compelling advantages. The ICE model provides familiar operation, quick refueling, and established technology, making it ideal for drivers with varied transportation needs, including frequent long-distance travel.

The EV model delivers superior performance, reduced operating costs, zero tailpipe emissions, and the convenience of home charging. Its limitations in charging speed and infrastructure requirements represent the primary compromises compared to its ICE counterpart.

Your ideal choice depends largely on your typical driving patterns, access to charging infrastructure, and personal priorities regarding performance, environmental impact, and technological adoption. Both models deliver the versatility and utility expected from the Equinox nameplate while approaching transportation from fundamentally different perspectives.

Whether you’re drawn to the established reliability of internal combustion or the cutting-edge advantages of electric propulsion, the Equinox lineup offers a compelling option to match your preferences and lifestyle.

5 Equinox EV vs ICE Facts

1. Acceleration Comparison – The Equinox EV accelerates from 0-100 km/h approximately 2 seconds faster than the ICE model despite weighing nearly 500 kg more, demonstrating the performance advantage of instant electric torque.

2. Regenerative Energy Recovery – The Equinox EV can recover up to 20% of its energy through regenerative braking in typical driving conditions, extending range while reducing brake wear compared to the ICE model.

3. Temperature Response Difference – The Equinox EV cabin reaches a comfortable temperature approximately 30% faster in winter conditions compared to the ICE model when using preconditioned heating while plugged in.

4. Sound Profile Distinction – The Equinox ICE produces approximately 72 decibels of sound at highway speeds compared to only 65 decibels in the EV model, resulting in a significantly quieter cabin experience.

5. Torque Delivery Physics – The Equinox EV delivers 100% of its maximum torque instantly from 0 RPM, while the ICE model requires reaching approximately 2,000 RPM to achieve peak torque output.

Common Questions About Equinox EV and ICE Models

What is the primary difference in driving experience between the Equinox EV and ICE?

• The electric vehicle delivers instant torque for immediate acceleration and offers a smoother, quieter drive experience with fewer vibrations. The regenerative braking system allows for one-pedal driving in many situations. The ICE model provides a more traditional driving experience with familiar engine sounds, mechanical feedback, and conventional braking characteristics.

How do charging times compare to refueling times?

• Refueling the Equinox ICE typically takes under 5 minutes at any gas station. The EV requires approximately 30 minutes to achieve an 80% charge at a DC fast charger, or 7-10 hours for a full charge using a Level 2 home charging station. This represents one of the most significant practical differences between the two models.

What are the maintenance cost differences between the two models?

• The Equinox EV eliminates oil changes, transmission service, and exhaust system maintenance, reducing service visits by approximately 60%. The regenerative braking system also extends brake pad life significantly. While the ICE model has lower initial purchase costs, the EV offers reduced lifetime maintenance expenses.

Can the Equinox EV handle long-distance travel as effectively as the ICE version?

• The ICE offers more flexibility for long-distance travel with quick refueling and established infrastructure. The EV requires more planning around charging station locations and charging times for trips beyond its 400-500 km range. However, as fast-charging networks expand, EVs become increasingly practical for longer journeys.

How do the two models compare in adverse weather conditions?

• Both models offer all-wheel drive for enhanced traction in challenging conditions. The EV battery and range are more significantly affected by extremely cold temperatures, potentially reducing range by 20-30%. However, the instant EV torque delivery can provide superior control in slippery conditions, and preconditioning features help mitigate cold-weather impacts.

Disclaimer: Content contained in this post is for informational purposes only and may include features and options from US or international models. Please contact the dealership for more information or to confirm vehicle, feature availability.